The therapist's legal duty when the patient may be violent.

نویسنده

  • J C Beck
چکیده

This article reviews the legal basis for the psychiatrist's duty to protect third parties who are foreseeably endangered by their patients. Cases illustrating how courts decide whether the duty exists and whether it was violated are presented. Courts are impressed by, and clinicians should know about, threats to particular individuals, existence of a credible motive for violence, and a past history of violence. The importance of careful note taking and obtaining consultation about these cases is stressed.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Tarasoff raid: a new extension of the duty to protect.

The authors discuss the general outlines of the Tarasoff duty of psychotherapists to protect potential victims of their violent patients. They describe the flexible range of clinical responses that therapists have utilized, as well as their professional concerns about preserving patient confidentiality (or at least strictly circumscribing the scope of disclosure when confidentiality must be bre...

متن کامل

When the patient threatens violence: an empirical study of clinical practice after Tarasoff.

The Tarasoff decisions have enunciated a new duty for psychotherapistsa duty to possible victims of potentially violent patients. This duty apparently complicates, and possibly undermines, the treatment of a class of patients already extraordinarily difficult to treat. Breach of the Tarasoff duty has been held to create a cause of action in only four states. Nevertheless, many psychiatrists els...

متن کامل

When the Patient Threatens Violence: An Empirical Study of Clinical Practice after Tarasoff

The Tarasoff decisions have enunciated a new duty for psychotherapistsa duty to possible victims of potentially violent patients. This duty apparently complicates, and possibly undermines, the treatment of a class of patients already extraordinarily difficult to treat. Breach of the Tarasoff duty has been held to create a cause of action in only four states. Nevertheless, many psychiatrists els...

متن کامل

Medical-legal Issues in the Agitated Patient: Cases and Caveats

INTRODUCTION More than any other area of emergency medicine, legal issues are paramount when caring for an agitated patient. It is imperative to have a clear understanding of these issues to avoid exposure to liability. These medico-legal issues can arise at the onset, during, and at discharge of care and create several duties. At the initiation of care, the doctor has a duty to evaluate for co...

متن کامل

Violent fantasy, dangerousness, and the duty to warn and protect.

An evaluation of homicidal ideation is a routine component of a mental status examination and may be evaluated in more depth in forensic evaluations as a dangerousness risk assessment. The evaluation of dangerousness often includes asking about violent fantasies that may have physical or sexual content. The authors examine the circumstances in which the revelation of violent fantasies to a ment...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Psychiatric clinics of North America

دوره 11 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1988